 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1891 - 782 pages
...entitled to a reasonable compensation for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what is reasonable is a judicial, and not a legislative,...already been shown, the practice has been otherwise. In countries where the common law prevails, it has been customary from time immemorial for the legislature... | |
 | Illinois - 1877 - 182 pages
...entitled to a reasonable compensation 'for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what is reasonable is a judicial and not a legislative...already been shown, the practice has been otherwise. In countries where the common-law prevails, it has been customary from time immemorial for the legislature... | |
 | 1877 - 558 pages
...reasonable compensation for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what IB reasonable is a judicial and not a legislative question....already been shown, the practice has been otherwise. In countries where the common law prevails, it has been customary from time immemorial for the legislature... | |
 | United States. Congress. House - 1877 - 526 pages
...entitled to a rcasonab'e compensation for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what is reasonable is a judicial and not a legislative question. As has already been thown, the practice has been otherwise. In countries where the common law prevails it has been customary... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1887 - 460 pages
...entitled to a reasonable compensation for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what is reasonable is a judicial and not a legislative...already been shown, the practice has been otherwise. In countries where the common law prevails, it has been customary from time immemorial, for the Legislature... | |
 | David Rorer - 1884 - 996 pages
...entitled to a reasonable compensation for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what is reasonable is a judicial and not a legislative...already been shown, the practice has been otherwise. In countries where the common law prevails, it has been customary from time immemorial for the legislature... | |
 | Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - 1885 - 760 pages
...entitled to a reasonable compensation for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what is reasonable is a judicial and not a legislative...question. As has already been shown, the practice is otherwise. In countries where the common law prevails, it has been customary from time immemorial... | |
 | John Norton Pomeroy, Edmund Hatch Bennett - 1886 - 764 pages
...entitled to a reasonable compensation for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what is reasonable is a judicial, and not a legislative...already been shown, the practice has been otherwise." It was held to be for the legislature to determine what is reasonable. A dissenting opinion by Field,... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1886 - 926 pages
...entitled to a reasonable compensation for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what is reasonable is a judicial and not a legislative question. As hits already been shown, the practice is otherwise. In countries where the common law prevails, it... | |
 | 1907 - 1210 pages
...establishing what shall be a reasonable rate. In Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 133, 24 L. Ed. 77, the court says : "It Is Insisted that what is reasonable Is a judicial...already been shown, the practice has been otherwise. Uhdoubtedly In mere private contracts relating to matters in which the public has no interest, what... | |
| |
It is insisted, however, that the owner of property is entitled to a reasonable compensation for its use, even though it be clothed with a public interest, and that what is reasonable is a judicial and not a legislative question. 
