The Relation of Cobordism to K-TheoriesSpringer, 2006 M11 14 - 116 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 45
Page
... M with a given complex structure on its stable tangent bundle T and a given compatible framing of T restricted to the boundary M. These bordism classes have Chern numbers and hence a Todd genus Τα : Ω U , fr 2n Q , Q.
... M with a given complex structure on its stable tangent bundle T and a given compatible framing of T restricted to the boundary M. These bordism classes have Chern numbers and hence a Todd genus Τα : Ω U , fr 2n Q , Q.
Page 4
... hence g = Tg . = < 7gX , gy > , It follows immediately that gμ = μ8 . ( 1.5 ) THEOREM . Consider the complex inner product space V of dimension n , with given SU - structure . If n = 4k + 2 then AV becomes a right quaternionic vector ...
... hence g = Tg . = < 7gX , gy > , It follows immediately that gμ = μ8 . ( 1.5 ) THEOREM . Consider the complex inner product space V of dimension n , with given SU - structure . If n = 4k + 2 then AV becomes a right quaternionic vector ...
Page 5
... Hence AV = RVR_ ( V ) . If X & RV , then μ ( xi ) = - ( μ X ) 1 = −Xi and Xi & R_ ( V ) . The theorem is then proved . v = y ; similarly define Rody Let Ʌody = Σ 2k + 1v , ^ Σ1 nev v = and Revv . V If n = 2 mod 4 then SU ( n ) od ет ...
... Hence AV = RVR_ ( V ) . If X & RV , then μ ( xi ) = - ( μ X ) 1 = −Xi and Xi & R_ ( V ) . The theorem is then proved . v = y ; similarly define Rody Let Ʌody = Σ 2k + 1v , ^ Σ1 nev v = and Revv . V If n = 2 mod 4 then SU ( n ) od ет ...
Page 7
... Hence y = 0 , and RV ~ R RW maps monomorphically into R ( VW ) . R the two are seen to have the same dimension , then RV RW R ( VW ) . R Since It is also seen that the actions of SU ( m ) × SU ( n ) on the two sides are identified . RV ...
... Hence y = 0 , and RV ~ R RW maps monomorphically into R ( VW ) . R the two are seen to have the same dimension , then RV RW R ( VW ) . R Since It is also seen that the actions of SU ( m ) × SU ( n ) on the two sides are identified . RV ...
Page 8
... Hence y ' & : R ( V + W ) ~ AV ® AW , and ( 2.1 ) is proved . H Return now to a single complex inner product space V of finite dimension . Given v ɛ V there is F F F ( X ) V : AV → AV defined by = V ^ X. There is also its adjoint ( F ) ...
... Hence y ' & : R ( V + W ) ~ AV ® AW , and ( 2.1 ) is proved . H Return now to a single complex inner product space V of finite dimension . Given v ɛ V there is F F F ( X ) V : AV → AV defined by = V ^ X. There is also its adjoint ( F ) ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abelian group algebra base point bordism bordism classes BSp(n bundle map c₁ ch+k characteristic classes Chern classes Chern numbers closed U-manifold cobordism coefficient groups cohomology theory complex inner product complex vector space consider COROLLARY CP(n CW pair X,A define denote diagram dimension Dold element epimorphism ɛ K(M finite CW complex finite CW pair framed manifold Hence Hirzebruch homotopy class Hopf HP(n identified induced inner product space integer K-theory kernel KSP(X LEMMA line bundle M²n map f module monomial MSU 4k MU(k multiplicative cohomology theory n+2k ñ¹(x P₁ partition polynomial Proof quaternionic quaternionic vector space Similarly stable tangent bundle stably framed manifold SU(n Suppose theorem Thom class Thom space Todd genus trivial U-structure U(n)-bundle unitary vector space bundle Z-graded εΩ Ωυ हु