Libertarianism DefendedRoutledge, 2021 M08 29 - 350 pages Ever since the publication in 1974 of Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia, libertarianism has been much discussed within political philosophy, science and economy circles. Yet libertarianism has been so strongly identified with Nozick's version of it that little attention has been devoted to other than Nozick's ideas and arguments. While Nozick's version of libertarianism has preoccupied the academic discussion Nozick himself did not respond to the many criticisms raised and yet other defenders of libertarianism have not remained silent. Jan Narveson, Loren Lomasky, Eric Mack, Douglas Rasmussen, Douglas Den Uyl and many others have contributed impressive arguments of their own in support of the libertarian idea that a political system is just when it successfully secures the rights of individuals understood within the Lockean classical liberal tradition. In this book Tibor R. Machan analyses the state of the debate on libertarianism post Nozick. Going far beyond the often cursory treatment of libertarianism in major books and other publications he examines closely the alternative non-Nozickian defenses of libertarianism that have been advanced and, by applying these arguments to innumerable policy areas in the field, Machan achieves a new visibility and prominence for libertarianism. |
Contents
13 | |
14 | |
Here to Stay? | 20 |
Justice Self and Natural Rights | |
Individualism and the Vitality of Community Life | |
Economics and Human Values | |
Finding the Rational | |
A Positive Libertarian View of Government | |
Should You Apologize? | |
Between Parent and Child | |
Should Hazardous Goods Be Banned? | |
HARD AND SOFT STATISM | |
The Ideology of Death that Will Not | |
Libertarianism and Conservatism | |
Socialism Redux on the Horizon | |
Two Philosophers Skeptical of Negative Liberty | |
Liberalism and Atomistic Individualism | |
LIBERTARIANISM PER | |
Allies After All? | |
Robert Nozick and the Libertarian Alternative | |
Will Technology Make Us Free? | |
How Critical is Critical Legal Studies? | |
Does Libertarianism Imply the Welfare State? | |
CONCLUSION | |
The Dependence of Equality on Liberty | |
Why Agreement isnt Enough 24 Against Fairness | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action American anarchists approach argue argument Aristotle Ayn Rand B. F. Skinner behavior believe Chicago choice citizens claim classical liberal coercion coercive communitarians compact theory concern conduct conservatives consider course Critical Legal Studies criticism Crits defend discussion economic economists equality ethics example exist fact flourishing force free market free society freedom fundamental goals Hoover Institution human community human nature Human Rights idea individual rights initiative involves issue Jan Narveson John Locke John Rawls justice justified kind lives Machan Marx Marxist matter means minarchist natural rights negative liberty negative rights normative objective obligation one’s parents person philosophical political theory position possible principles problem protection public policy question rational Rawls reality reason requires respect Robert Nozick sense simply skepticism someone Sterba things Tibor tradition true understanding University Press values violate virtue wealth welfare wrong York