A Subtle and Mysterious Machine: The Medical World of Walter Charleton (1619-1707)Springer Science & Business Media, 2005 M10 18 - 297 pages Walter Charleton is an intriguing character—he flits through the diaries of Pepys and Evelyn, the correspondence of Margaret Cavendish, and his texts appear in the libraries of better-known contemporaries. We catch sight of him 1 conversing with Pepys about teeth, arguing with Inigo Jones about the origin of 2 Stonehenge, being lampooned in contemporary satire, stealing from the Royal Society, and embarrassing himself in anatomical procedures. While extremely active in a broad range of Royal Society investigations, his main discovery there seems to have been that tadpoles turned into frogs. As a practising physician of limited means, Walter Charleton was reliant for his living upon patrons and his medical practice—in addition he had the m- fortune to live in an era of dramatic political change, and consequently of unpredictable fortune. His achievements were known on the Continent. Despite his embarrassments in Royal Society anatomical investigation he was offered the prestigious chair of anatomy at the University of Padua. He turned down this extraordinary opportunity, only to die destitute in his native country a couple of decades later. The lugubrious doctor is without doubt an enigma. Charleton’s Anglicanism and staunch Royalism were unwavering throughout his career. The latter caused difficulties for him when he attempted to gain membership of the College of Physicians during the interregnum. His religious views were a source of concern when he was offered the position at Padua. |
Contents
Rewriting Walter Charleton Physick and Natural Philosophy | 32 |
The Alembic of our Pen Charletons Identity as a Physician | 52 |
The Animal Oeconomy Natural History 1659 in the Context of English Physiology | 81 |
The Republick of Letters Charletons Identity in the Royal Society College of Physicians | 109 |
Enquiries into Human Nature 1680 Charletons Anatomy and Physiology after the Royal Society | 137 |
Three Anatomic Lectures 1683 Ways of Knowing and the Anatomical Body | 178 |
Conclusions | 216 |
Annotated bibliography of the works of Walter Charleton | 223 |
| 243 | |
| 254 | |
Other editions - View all
A Subtle and Mysterious Machine: The Medical World of Walter Charleton (1619 ... Emily Booth No preview available - 2010 |
Common terms and phrases
activities analogy ancient Animal Oeconomy animal spirits argued argument audience authority blood body Borelli Boyle brain Brown cause chapter Charleton's lectures Charleton's presentation chyle claims classical College of Physicians contemporary context Deliramenta demonstration depicted Descartes discourse discussion dissection doctrine eclectic eclecticism emphasis England English Enquiries Ephesian Matron Epicurus epistemology examined experimental experiments explanation faculties fibres Francis Glisson Frank Galenic George Ent Glisson Harvey heart historians History of Medicine hypothesis ideas identity illustrate important innovation Inquisitiones intellectual invoked knowledge Latin learned London Margaret Cavendish mechanical mechanical philosophy mechanist method motu muscles Natural History natural philosophers Nayler nerves Oeconomia Animalis Oxford Physiologists physical physician physiology practice professional publication published reason reference rejected Robert Boyle role Royal Society Science scientific revolution Scorbuto seems self-construction self-presentation seventeenth century Shapin soul status suggests textual theory Thomas Willis Three Anatomic Lectures tion traditional understanding University Press virtuoso Walter Charleton Webster writings
Popular passages
Page 16 - And I have been greatly helped by considering machines. The only difference I can see between machines and natural objects is that the workings of machines are mostly carried out by apparatus large enough to be readily perceptible by the senses (as is required to make their manufacture humanly possible), whereas natural processes almost always depend on parts so small that they utterly elude our senses. But mechanics, which is a part or species of physics, uses no concepts but belong also to physics...